Feed aggregator

Malkin's Handy History of Fake Noose

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
Three weeks ago, when I first documented troubling questions...

Bogus Gun Research

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01

Cardinal Zen Is a Hero for China and the Catholic Church

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
Cardinal Joseph Zen, an 87-year-old native of Shanghai who served as bishop of Hong Kong, is a Chinese patriot and faithful Catholic.

Smollett And the 'Fakes First' Media

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
The left would expect mere mortals to understand that as opposed to them, the left rises above the rumormongering and misinformation of social media.

The Wall Versus Judicial Supremacy

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
Consider just one days traffic at a single section of the border that lacks a physical barrier.

Democrats Again Chase the Holy Grail of “Universal” Background Checks

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
Far easier is it for our men and women in Congress to trumpet a piece of feel-good legislation that accomplishes nothing of substance but sounds oh-so-good in a political sound-bite.

3 Lessons From the Jussie Smollett Hoax

TownHall Latest columns - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 19:01
So, Jussie Smollett was lying...

Want a More Future-Focused Government? Climate Action Is Just the Start

Cato Recent Op Eds - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 09:54

Ryan Bourne

The reaction was predictable.

Last week’s Climate Strike by schoolchildren was met with an inane debate about whether or not the pupils were right to “play truant”.

This dialogue of the deaf was a missed opportunity. Politicians should take seriously the protesters’ demand that they “recognise that young people have the biggest stake in our future”.

How we weigh policies which differentially impact today’s adults and future generations has been a recurring undercurrent of the last decade of British politics — including on deficit reduction and Brexit. It’s time we asked whether we get the balance right.

The children who went on strike last week were right to argue that future generations get a raw deal in policymaking. But this is a structural flaw of government action that extends far beyond carbon emissions.

Government policies shape the use of vast economic resources. Underpinning all decisions are judgements about the relative importance of the present against the future.

State action to curb carbon emissions, for example, requires avoiding cheaper fuels today for investment in technologies with future payoffs.

End-of-life healthcare, in contrast, means expending resources today that society could otherwise deploy into research and development spending or tax cuts to induce innovation and higher living standards in future.

Climate policy is all about balancing the interests of current and future populations.

Comparing different policies over time requires governments to assume a “social discount rate” — a rate of interest that means that future costs and benefits can all be examined at their present value. The higher the discount rate is, the less we are willing to give things up today for benefits in the future.

But it is not obvious at all what that social discount rate on government projects should be.

People usually have a clear preference for the present over the future, meaning that the discount rate would be positive. We could invest money that we do not spend on reducing carbon emissions, after all, and it will return more over time.

This, and the fact that unforeseen events may wipe out the earth at any moment, leads many to argue for policies to be present-biased.

But this can lead to difficult moral territory. As George Mason University’s Tyler Cowen has outlined, a positive discount rate of two per cent implies that one life today is worth seven in 100 years; a five per cent rate means that a life today is worth 132 after a century.

Moreover, with issues with potentially big externalities, such as climate change, one could argue that discounting downplays the very real impacts that today’s decisions will have on distant generations. Cowen himself argues then that the correct social discount rate is near zero.

The discount rate we apply to the economic analysis determines the starting point for the debate on cutting carbon emissions.

The Nobel Prize winning economist William Nordhaus used a discount rate closer to market interest rates to argue that modest carbon emission reductions over future decades were optimal. Lord Stern’s report for the UK government famously used a tiny discount rate, resulting in the call for more urgent and drastic action.

When children claim that the government is not focused enough on their future, they are implicitly saying that the discount rate applied is currently too high. This makes a stronger case for more carbon mitigation today, assuming that it works and does not lead us to ignore other unforeseen important issues.

But the implication of demanding that the government stop thinking in such a short-termist way could extend well beyond CO2.

The past eight years have seen much discussion on how deficit reduction insulated pensioners at the expense of working-age welfare recipients, for short-run electoral gain.

This is just one manifestation of what happens when governments seek reelection at the expense of long-term thinking. There are no end of examples of government policies which amount to channelling money or resources to certain groups today, rather than maximising the sustainable future growth of the economy.

Yet if we really placed equal moral weight on future generations, this would imply that the best social use of resources would be to generate robust long-term sustainable growth.

A future-obsessed government would probably be spending far less on welfare, pensions, and healthcare for current generations — all programmes that do not add to the long-term productive capacity of the economy.

Instead, it would be seeking to ensure that resources remained where they were most likely to generate innovation, which would compound to deliver huge gains over time.

The children who went on strike last week were right to argue that future generations get a raw deal in policymaking. But this is a structural flaw of government action that extends far beyond carbon emissions.

If they really care about future generations, kids today should be bunking off school to demand policies to deliver robust long-term economic growth.

Ryan Bourne occupies the R Evan Scharf Chair in the Public Understanding of Economics at the Cato Institute in Washington DC.

Trump campaign pokes fun at Bernie Sanders' 2020 announcement, as reaction splits on candidacy

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 09:50
The Trump campaign slammed Bernie Sanders moments after he announced he will make another bid for president by entering the crowded 2020 race.

‘Moderate’ a dirty word? 2020 Dems cringe at being labeled less than liberal

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 09:18
The Democratic presidential candidates are, with only a few exceptions, shunning the 'moderate' label as they court the party base.

Trump mocks California over ‘Fast Train,’ firing back at emergency declaration lawsuit

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 08:42
President Trump on Tuesday ridiculed California for its “failed Fast Train project” as he fired back at a multi-state lawsuit opposing his declaration of a national emergency on the southern border.

McCabe is trying to ‘audition as a resistance figure’ like Comey did: Chris Stirewalt

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 07:38
Former Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe is following in the footsteps of his former boss, ex-FBI Director James Comey, argued Fox News politics editor Chris Stirewalt.

Who's running for president in 2020? Growing field of candidates join race for Democratic nod

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 07:31
The 2020 presidential race is starting to heat up, and the Democratic field could get crowded — fast.

Kamala Harris, Cory Booker, other 2020 Dems forced to change tune on Jussie Smollett case

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 06:56
They say hindsight is 20/20. And that’s certainly the case for some Democratic presidential hopefuls as twists continue to emerge in the case of the alleged attack on actor Jussie Smollett.

Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders enters crowded 2020 presidential race

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 06:32
Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., announced Tuesday he will make another bid for president by entering the already crowded 2020 race, as he tries to rekindle the grassroots energy from his 2016 primary run against Hillary Clinton. 

Trump 'not mentally well,' should be removed under 25th Amendment, former Bush ethics attorney says

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 05:45
President Donald Trump is “not well at all mentally” and Congress needs to remove him under the 25th Amendment, former President George W. Bush’s chief ethics attorney Richard Painter said Monday.

Ocasio-Cortez raises eyebrows after comparing Trump's border wall to Berlin Wall

Fox News (Politics) - Tue, 02/19/2019 - 05:36
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez raised eyebrows after comparing President Trump’s border wall plans to the Berlin Wall separating the communist Germany from the free world.


Syndicate content
Syndicate content